Document Type : Applied Article

Authors

Department of Electrical Engineering, Imam Reza International University, Mashhad, Iran.

10.22044/jadm.2025.15484.2662

Abstract

In the context of advancing sixth-generation (6G) communication networks, ensuring high-quality user coverage across varying geographic landscapes remains a paramount objective. Terrestrial base stations conventionally provide this coverage; however, they are susceptible to disruption due to adverse environmental conditions. Consequently, the integration of airborne mobile stations is pivotal for continued user coverage support. Among the viable solutions for terrestrial station augmentation, the deployment of drone base stations (DBS) emerges as the optimal substitute. Nonetheless, the establishment of a drone-based infrastructure presents challenges in terms of time and cost efficiency. Thus, the strategic positioning of DBSs, aimed at maximizing user coverage while simultaneously minimizing path loss and the number of drones required, is essential to achieving efficient and high-quality service provisioning.
This study introduces a novel and optimized DBS placement strategy utilizing the Marine Predators Algorithm (MPA)—a recent metaheuristic renowned for its potent resistance to entrapment in local optima. Through simulation, we demonstrate that our proposed methodology distinctly surpasses analogous approaches with regards to optimization of path loss and user coverage. Simulation outcomes reveal average path losses of 71.75 dB for the Gray Wolf Optimization (GWO), 75.78 dB for the Weighted Time-Based Non-Orthogonal Multiple Access (TW-NOMA), and a significantly reduced 56.13 dB for our proposed MPA-based method, thereby indicating a substantial decrease of at least 15 dB in path loss compared to current techniques.

Keywords

Main Subjects

[1] D. Mishra, A. M. Vegni, V. Loscrí, and E. Natalizio, "Drone networking in the 6G era: A technology overview," IEEE Communications Standards Magazine, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 88–95, Dec. 2021.
 
[2] J. Angjo, I. Shayea, M. Ergen, H. Mohamad, A. Alhammadi, and Y. I. Daradkeh, "Handover management of drones in future mobile networks: 6G technologies," IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 12803–12823, Jan. 2021.
 
[3] M. Kishk, A. Bader, and M. S. Alouini, "Aerial base station deployment in 6G cellular networks using tethered drones: The mobility and endurance tradeoff," IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 103–111, Sep. 2020.
 
[4] A. Basu, H. Oroojeni, G. Samakovitis, and M. M. Al-Rifaie, "Three-dimensional drone cell placement: Drone placement for optimal coverage," Future Internet, vol. 16, no. 11, article 401, Oct. 2024.
 
[5] T. Khaled et al., "Drone-enabled connectivity: Advancements and challenges in B5G/6G networks," in Proc. 8th Int. Conf. Image and Signal Process. Appl. (ISPA), Apr. 2024, pp. 1–7.
 
[6] S. Abdel-Razeq et al., "Artificial intelligence-driven unmanned aerial vehicle base station placement: Current advances, challenges, and use case," in Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Fog Mobile Edge Comput. (FMEC), Sep. 2024, pp. 69–73.
 
[7] C. W. Chen, "Internet of video things: Next-generation IoT with visual sensors," IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 7, no. 8, pp. 6676–6685, Aug. 2020.
 
[8] S. Y. Chang, K. Park, J. Kim, and J. Kim, "Securing UAV flying base station for mobile networking: A review," Future Internet, vol. 15, no. 5, article 176, May 2023.
 
[9] I. Kabashkin, "Availability of services in wireless sensor network with aerial base station placement," Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, vol. 12, no. 3, article 39, May 2023.
 
[10] J. Carvajal-Rodríguez, D. S. Guamán, C. Tipantuña, C. Grijalva, and L. F. Urquiza, "3D placement optimization in UAV-enabled communications: A systematic mapping study," IEEE Open Journal of Vehicular Technology, Mar. 2024.
 
[11] F. Sabahi, "Fuzzy Adaptive Granulation Multi-Objective Multi-microgrid Energy Management," Journal of AI and Data Mining, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 481-489, Nov. 2020.
 
[12] H. B. Salameh, A. E. Masadeh, and G. El Refae, "Intelligent drone-base-station placement for improved revenue in B5G/6G systems under uncertain fluctuated demands," IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 106740–106749, Oct. 2022.
 
[13] H. Alsolai et al., "Optimization of drone base station location for the next-generation Internet-of-Things using a pre-trained deep learning algorithm and NOMA," Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 8, article 1947, Apr. 2023.
 
[14] G. Amponis et al., "Drones in B5G/6G networks as flying base stations," Drones, vol. 6, no. 2, article 39, Feb. 2022.
 
[15] B. Li, K. Li, and J. Chen, "A UAV migration-based decision-making scheme for on-demand service in 6G network," Alexandria Engineering Journal, vol. 69, pp. 25–33, Apr. 2023.
 
[16] Q. Zhu, J. Zheng, and A. Jamalipour, "Coverage performance analysis of a cache-enabled UAV base station assisted cellular network," IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 8454–8467, Apr. 2023.
 
[17] M. Q. Alsudani et al., "Positioning optimization of UAV (drones) base station in communication networks," Malaysian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 429–439, May 2023.
 
[18] H. B. Salameh et al., "Opportunistic non-contiguous OFDMA scheduling framework for future B5G/6G cellular networks," Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, vol. 119, article 102563, Sep. 2022.
 
[19] R. K. Gupta, S. Kumar, and R. Misra, "Resource allocation for UAV-assisted 5G mMTC slicing networks using deep reinforcement learning," Telecommunication Systems, vol. 82, no. 1, pp. 141–159, Jan. 2023.
 
[20] D. Pliatsios et al., "Drone-base-station for next-generation internet-of-things: A comparison of swarm intelligence approaches," IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 3, pp. 32–47, 2021.
 
[21] H. Alsolai et al., "Optimization of drone base station location for the next-generation Internet-of-Things using a pre-trained deep learning algorithm and NOMA," Mathematics, vol. 11, no. 8, article 1947, Apr. 2023.