Reward and Penalty Model for the Lighting of Public Thoroughfares Contracts: An Empirical Study in a Distribution Company

Ghotboddini, R.; Toossian Shandiz, H.

doi:10.22044/jadm.2021.10730.2210

Document Type : Original/Review Paper

Authors

¹ Faculty of Electrical and Robotic Engineering, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood, Iran.

² Department of Electrical Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22044/jadm.2021.10730.2210

Abstract

Lighting continuity is one of the preferences of citizens. Public lighting management from the viewpoint of city residents improves social welfare. The quality of lamps and duration of lighting defect correction is important in lighting continuity. In this regard, reward and penalty mechanism plays an important role in contract. Selecting labor and lamps has a significant impact on risk reduction during the contract period. This research improves strategies for public lighting asset management. The lifespan of lamp that announced by manufacturers is used to calculate maintenance cost in order to provide a possibility to estimate the actual cost of high-pressure sodium luminaire in public lighting system. Guarantee period of lamps and maximum permissible lighting defect detection and correction time is used for reward and penalty mechanism. The result shows that the natural life guarantee and permissible correction time have a considerable effect in maintenance cost and city resident’s satisfaction.

Keywords

20.1001.1.23225211.2022.10.1.11.9

References

[1] R. P. Hoskins, A. T. Brint, and G. Strbac, “A structured approach to Asset Management within the electricity industry,” Util. Policy, Vol. 7, No. 4, pp. 221–232, 1999.

[2] H. Wang, “A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems,” Eur. J. Oper. Res., Vol. 139, No. 3, pp. 469–489, 2002.

[3] D. I. Cho and M. Parlar, “Invited Review A survey of maintenance models for multi- unit systems,” Eur. J. Oper. Researc, Vol. 51, pp. 1–23, 1991.

[4] A. Rahman, “Maintenance contract model for complex asset/equipment,” Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng., Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 1–11, 2014.

[5] M. Tantardini, A. Portioli-Staudacher, and M. Macchi, “A model for considering the impact of rescheduling planned maintenance activities in a maintenance service contract,” Prod. Plan. Control, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 241–259, 2014.

[6] D. R. Godoy, R. Pascual, and P. Knights, “A decision-making framework to integrate maintenance contract conditions with critical spares management,” Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf., Vol. 131, pp. 102–108, 2014.

[7] B. Susanti, R. D. Wirahadikusumah, B. W. Soemardi, and M. Sutrisno, “Impact of Performance Based Contract Implementation on National Road Maintenance Project to Road Functional Performance,” Appl. Mech. Mater., Vol. 845, pp. 364–368, 2016.

[8] H. Haapasalo, A. Aapaoja, S. Björkman, and M. Matinheikki, “Applying the choosing by advantages method to select the optimal contract type for road maintenance,” Int. J. Procure. Manag., Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 643–665, 2015.

[9] J. M. Lozano and M. Sánchez-Silva, “Improving decision-making in maintenance policies and contract specifications for infrastructure projects,” Struct. Infrastruct. Eng., Vol. 15, No. 8, pp. 1087–1102, 2019.

[10] S. Abdul Hadi, M. R. Al Kaabi, M. O. Al Ali, and H. A. Arafat, “Comparative Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of streetlight technologies for minor roads in United Arab Emirates,” Energy Sustain. Dev., Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 438–450, Oct. 2013.

[11] O. M. Arafa and A. A. Mansour, “Economic study of replacing conventional ballast with electronic ballast for high pressure sodium lamps used in public lighting in Egypt,” J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol., Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 120–132, May 2015.

[12] A. A. Mansour and O. A. Arafa, “Comparative study of 250W high pressure sodium lamp operating from both conventional and electronic ballast,” J. Electr. Syst. Inf. Technol., Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 234–254, 2014.

[13] M. Bebbington, C. Lai, and R. Zitikis, “Lifetime analysis of incandescent lamps: The Menon-Agrawal model revisited,” THEORY Appl., Vol. 1, No. 1990, pp. 97–108, 2008.

[14] M. Banejad and H. Ijadi, “High impedance fault detection : Discrete wavelet transform and fuzzy function approximation,” J. AI Data Min., Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 149–158, 2014.

[15] A. Ghaffari and S. Nobahary, “FDMG: Fault detection method by using genetic algorithm in clustered wireless sensor networks,” J. AI Data Min., Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 47–57, 2015.

[16] M. J. Mirzaei, R. Dashti, A. Kazemi, and M. H. Amirioun, “An asset-management model for use in the evaluation and regulation of public-lighting systems,” Util. Policy, Vol. 32, pp. 19–28, Mar. 2015.

[17] M. J. Mirzaei, M. H. Amirioun, A. Kazemi, and R. Dashti, “Optimal contracting strategies for public-lighting asset management:A case study from Iran,” Util. Policy, Vol. 64, p. 101048, Jun. 2020.

[18] T. K. Yaakov Bar-Shalom, X. Rong Li, Estimation with Applications to Tracking and Navigation. John Wiley Sons, 2001.

[19] Vossloh-Schwabe Deutschland GmbH., “Technical Details – Components for Discharge Lamps.” .

[20] E. Ignitors, “Ignitors and Accessories for Discharge Lamps SUPERIMPOSED , PULSE AND INSTANT RESTRIKE.” “vialox NAV-E,” 2017.

Journal of AI and Data Mining

Reward and Penalty Model for the Lighting of Public Thoroughfares Contracts: An Empirical Study in a Distribution Company

References

References

Volume 10, Issue 1
January 2022
Pages 127-138

Reward and Penalty Model for the Lighting of Public Thoroughfares Contracts: An Empirical Study in a Distribution Company

References

References

Volume 10, Issue 1January 2022Pages 127-138

Volume 10, Issue 1
January 2022
Pages 127-138